Tuesday, July 30, 2013

Education


We are about to start another school year and we will begin to hear complaints about excessive classroom sizes, crumbling buildings, ill equipped classrooms, poor graduation rates, poor performances against other countries, and of course pleas for more money to solve all those problems. 

The truth is that this money will be spent to mostly line the pockets of political contributors, pay excessive salaries to administrators, lots of studies to see why our school system is failing, and a host of other non-educational related things. Very little of it will find it’s way into the classroom and the salaries of those dedicated teachers on the front lines. Let’s face it, the education system in this country (and most of the world) is broken, and throwing money at it will only compound the problem.

The problem is twofold. First it has become a very profitable way to feed off the public trough. While it might be very difficult to pass a bond issue to improve an intersection or build a government office building, school bond issues usually pass quite easily. Additionally, legislators are always loth to block school related legislation so even ill conceived funding bills pass easily.

Most school systems have more administrative staff than teachers, and a large proportion of those get paid far more than the teachers who actually do the heavy lifting. Additionally since these administrators have little actual work to do they spend their time  dreaming up ways to impede and restrict the teachers from doing their job effectively. A prime example of this is the “standardized test”. Which is used to “evaluate teacher’s performance”. While I agree that some method of evaluating teachers effectiveness is useful, the way that those tests are set up forces teachers to teach students how to pass those tests, rather than useful real skills. In short we have far too many chiefs and not enough indians. 

The second part of the problem is that the curriculum and the teaching methods are the same that they have been for the past several hundred years. The world has changed mightily in the past century and a huge amount in the past 20 years. If we conclude that the purpose of school is to prepare children to be employable, and good members of society, we have to realize that both of those things are completely different than they were even 20 years ago. For example, there is little need for cursive writing and long division skills. Most people write on keyboards and have calculators to do math. While I don’t advocate dropping writing and math from schools, they need to be deemphasized in favor of more useful skills such as keyboarding, computer operation, and skills related to analysis of problems so as to be able to use the tools we have available rather than being to calculate complex math in our head or on paper.

Another thing that has seems to have gotten lost, is the ability to write coherently. Since that is something that is difficult to check on a multiple choice standardized test and is time consuming for overworked teachers to grade, It has received a bit of a deemphasis in today’s classroom. The written word has become even more important in today’s world, where most communication is via text (no longer handwritten but text nevertheless). Clear, concise, communication is more important than ever. Being able to write and of course read and understand the written word is more important than ever. Yet we have a crisis where 3rd graders can’t read or write reasonably well, and the administrators want to advance them anyhow because it’d look bad on their record if they had too many failures to advance. Which is worse, holding a child back or making them take a summer remedial reading class, or setting them up for failure down the road? 

While “No Child Left Behind” sounded good, the result has too many times been “slow everyone to the lowest common denominator”. Which pushes the bright students into boredom and teaches the average students that they don’t have to work hard to meet expectations. In short it has dragged the whole system and a couple of generations of our children down. It’s high time to adopt an “Everyone to the Best of Their Abilities” mantra. With computerized courses being able to allow students to go at their own pace in learning, and the ability of each student to have his own iPad type device, every student should be able to progress at their own pace. Teachers, freed from route teaching, can spend their time on individual instruction and encouragement. Progress can be easily measured without standardized tests, and will free the students and teachers from the stress and wasted classroom time preparing and taking these largely meaningless tests. Most importantly, individual progress can be assessed, and remedies applied frequently, rather than at testing time, when it’s likely too late.

A serious flaw in the system is that it is run by academicians. They got their higher education from people who became teachers immediately after graduation after getting their education from people who became teachers immediately after graduation and so on. Seldom has there been someone in the chain with real world experience in industry or business. Given the rapid pace of change in the world we need teachers that teach our children the skills that are useful to make them productive in the real world. Let’s involve outsiders in textbook writing, and curriculum planning, and invite in guest teachers from time to time. Lots more hands on learning would be a good idea too.

It’ll take some creative work to finance the new equipment and a lot of effort to alter the curriculum. But, in the long run, we’ll have better educated kids more able to get good jobs and a lot fewer dropouts. Also, it'll give those underutilized administrators something productive to do.  I think, ultimately, it won’t cost any more than the current bloated, ineffective system if we can keep the money-grubbers out of it. 

Sunday, July 14, 2013

Florida v. George Zimmerman


The Jury has reached a verdict in the case of George Zimmerman and Trayvon Martin. A lot will be heard of about how unfair the verdict was, and that we are allowing racism to run rampant in this country. Since I didn’t hear all the testimony, and the information that I have has been colored by the news media, I have to defer to the jury’s opinion. I trust that they will be able to live with their decision. Whether that decision was absolutely correct, or was influenced by all the publicity, or botched by incompetence of the prosecution is something that I’m sure will be endlessly debated in the media and on line for months. But the verdict is in and we must accept it.

My take on what happened is that two people saw something that, in each of their views of the world, alarmed them, and they reacted to an imagined threat. Fear overruled common sense, and the outcome was unfortunate in the extreme. My heart goes out to the Martin family for their great loss. 

The only silver lining in this is that it makes us reexamine our own reactions to someone who is different than us. Why, in a mixed race neighborhood, (or anywhere) would a black teenager walking home be viewed as anything out of the ordinary? I can see that, in spite of the vast strides we have made since the 60s, our perceptions of other people are still colored by appearance. Some of that is fed to us by the media. How many more times have you heard “the suspect is a black/hispanic/Muslim etc.” than “the suspect was a white/Protestant”. 

After the Oklahoma City bombing I never once heard any mention of Timothy McVey’s religion. There were certainly no threatened or actual burnings of Methodist churches, like there were of mosques after 9-11. After all it is more dramatic if the villain is a ......... (Insert race/gender/age/religion/sexual preference here) than a clean cut well dressed person of our race/gender/age/religion /sexual preference. So we are trained to equate different race/gender/age/religion /sexual preferences with villainy, and therefore all ......... are suspect. It is that perception that we have to overcome. 

It has been 50 years since we struck down  “separate but equal” and got rid of “No Colored Allowed”, or “Back of the bus”. It’s high time we stopped judging people by appearance and started using the same value system for everyone, regardless of race/gender/age/religion /sexual preference.

We need to examine our own feelings. Do we somehow fear the unknown or different? If we were walking along a dark street and came up on another person or someone was walking behind us, would our perception of what we see, or imagine, color our emotional response to the situation? Of course it would. It’s only human nature. The important thing is to temper our reactions. If the threat is only in our perception, then leave it there, perhaps some caution is in order, but don’t let our imagination place us in a situation where we overreact and harm ourselves or someone else.
I’m reminded of the song in Rodgers and Hammerstein’s South Pacific “You’ve Got to be Carefully Taught”.

You've got to be taught
To hate and fear
You've got to be taught
From year to Year
It's got to be drummed 
in your dear little ear
You've got to be carefully taught

You've got to be taught
To be Afraid
Of people whose eyes 
are oddly made
And people whose skin
Is a different shade
You've got to be carefully taught

You've got to be taught
Before it's too late
Before you are 6 or 7 or 8 
To hate all the people 
your relatives hate
You've got to be carefully taught


Well, I propose that we can be untaught hate and fear, and to embrace all people as equals and judge everyone as an individual. 

Let us make this Trayvon’s legacy, that we overcame our prejudices and began accepting everyone as valuable human beings, regardless of race/gender/age/religion/sexual preference, and embrace those differences, for adding spice to our lives, instead of being a threat.